Shortcut: WD:RFD

Wikidata:Requests for deletions

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Requests for deletions
Items which do not meet Wikidata's notability policy can be deleted. Please nominate items for deletions on this page under the "Requests" section below. If it is obvious vandalism, just add the page here (gadget available), or ping an administrator to delete it. Contact can also be made with an administrator in #wikidata connect.

Before deleting items, check to ensure that they are not in use. This can be easily done with the "links" link below the header of each request.

Do not try to pre-emptively delete an item because its page is up for deletion on a Wikimedia project. The link will be removed by bots and reported here in the future if a deletion takes place.

Please use {{Q}} the first time you mention an item. Unless you use the gadget, please also ping the item's creator in your request (or ping the bot operator, when appropriate) if 1) the user is still active on Wikidata and 2) the user has contributed the majority of information in that item.

Please use Wikidata:Properties for deletion if you want to nominate a property for deletion.

This is not the place to request undeletion. Please use Wikidata:Administrators' noticeboard instead. If help is needed with the merging of items, see the instructions at Help:Merge.

Add a new request

On this page, old requests are archived, if they are marked with {{Deleted}}. An overview of all archives can be found at this page's archive index. The current archive is located at December 8.

Requests for deletions

high

135 open requests for deletions.

Contents

Pages tagged with {{Delete}}[edit]

Click here to purge if this list is out of date.

Requests[edit]

Please add a new request at the bottom of this section, using {{subst:Rfd |1=PAGENAME |2=REASON FOR DELETION }}.



~410 Azerbaijani films[edit]

(Those items are listed at User:Pasleim/Items for deletion/Page deleted/Archive/2017-2.)
There are ~410 items about Azerbaijani films whose only sitelinks were deleted by azwiki admin User:Vusal1981 in October/November 2017. There are no identifiers, links, or references on the items, and they have barely been touched in the past 14 months by editors (as it happens to most abandoned items). As I have no idea where I can lookup information about them, I’d like to ask the community whether anyone can rescue these items so that they meet the notability requirements, or whether they shall be deleted as non-notable items. —MisterSynergy (talk) 08:28, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

  • We used to have more of them. I don't think they were based on an online resource. I vaguely recall discussing them with a contributor to that wiki. I don't recall who that was though. Obviously, it would be good to keep them, but that would need a reference to confirm them. --- Jura 08:39, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
  • Found it: User_talk:Sotiale/Archive_A#azwiki. --- Jura 09:10, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
  • @MisterSynergy: can we close this as withdrawn/not done? --- Jura 12:10, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
    • Well, most of the items have not changed since I filed this request, and formally they do not meet the notability requirements. I would rather see them being deleted, as we don't have an idea what this really is about… —MisterSynergy (talk) 12:14, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
      • @MisterSynergy: I think they could be referenced: as such they do. --- Jura 12:20, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
      • @MisterSynergy: The usual refer for these is probably [1] --- Jura 10:36, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
  • @Jura1: According to the Wikidata policy, if only a trusted source exists, it can exist regardless of the wiki link. So I think it's possible if the source is confirmed. The items I deleted in the past were deleted because they were not verified, but I think they should be undelete once the source is confirmed. --Sotiale (talk) 10:38, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
Isn't it kind of hard to look something up if it has already been deleted? Quakewoody (talk)
My memory is not correct, but the items already deleted had a record deleted by the local administrator. So I think it's possible to look at the deleted contributions from local administrator. Then we can find the deleted items. It's not impossible, but it's a bit hard. --Sotiale (talk) 15:37, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
  • @Vusal1981, MisterSynergy, Sotiale, Jura1, Quakewoody: This request is now open for nearly a year. Given that it didn't found a consensus to delete the data, does anybody oppose closing the request? ChristianKl❫ 20:10, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
    • Yeah, let's keep all the dead content where nobody has an idea what it is about :-( —MisterSynergy (talk) 21:27, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Maybe if we remove the items from the list which have been worked on, it will make it easier to work on the remaining items in the future. So, instead of leaving notes saying that an item is a keeper, we remove the keepers and leave notes saying "I looked on AZ and there is no article" - that way others aren't looking for information on the same items at the same places. Quakewoody (talk)

Q61446814[edit]

Q61446814: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

It seems to be this series has no seasons: http://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seznam_d%C3%ADlů_seriálu_Děrevnja_durakov Queryzo (talk) 06:12, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 06:20, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Derevnya durakov (The Fool's Village) was a part of sketch TV show en:Calambur. Calambur had 6 seasons. I'm not sure if Derevnya durakov divided by seasons itself. Anyway, it's not our problem for now, request the deletion of the Czech article in their project first. --Wolverène (talk) 08:58, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

... so you did it wrong. --Wolverène (talk) 09:05, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
  • @Queryzo: looking above your move seem to be controversial, could you please explain? ‐‐1997kB (talk) 04:40, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
    you can feel free to revert my edits, I'm not familiar with this series and may did wrong with requesting a deletion. Queryzo (talk) 11:24, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

Q22284875[edit]

Berlin Jungfernheide station (Q22284875): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Incomplete and erroneous duplicate of Q567079 --Iulle (talk) 20:24, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 4 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:30, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
It look like S+U Jungfernheide (Q567079) is about all the station including Fernbahnhof and S-bahn rail. and Berlin Jungfernheide station (Q22284875) is only about s-bahn. but I don't know if it is right or not. - yona b (talk) 11:03, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
That's correct. That's why Q22284875 has a Property:P361 pointing to Q567079. One cannot merge these items without removing that property first. - cycŋ - (talkcontribslogs) 06:14, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
I started to clean up the three items. But it is a bit difficult S+U Jungfernheide (Q567079) Berlin Jungfernheide station (Q22284875) Jungfernheide metro station (Q19951075) --GPSLeo (talk) 17:09, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

There have been some changes in the items recently. @Srittau, MB-one, GodeNehler, GPSLeo: can you please have a look, particularly at the item histories [2][3][4]? I have no idea how we usually model railway stations. —MisterSynergy (talk) 07:52, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

The content of Berlin Jungfernheide station (Q22284875) should definitely not get removed until the deletion request is decided. But we have to decide if a station with a part for the S-Bahn (Q95723) and a part for the regular railway should have two separate items or not. --GPSLeo (talk) 08:09, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
I would propose to stay only with item S+U Jungfernheide (Q567079) and to remove item Berlin Jungfernheide station (Q22284875) as the Berlin S-Bahn (Q99654) of Berlin has only combined items with S-Bahn and Train. There are only separate item for Berlin U-Bahn (Q68646), see also item Berlin Alexanderplatz station (Q698497), Berlin-Friedrichstraße railway station (Q702402) or Berlin Hauptbahnhof (Q1097). --GodeNehler (talk) 08:51, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
I don't know if this is the case here, but S-Bahn stations are quite often treated as separate stations from the main line stations, they share the name with, if they don't share any track infrastructure (which is the case here). So, I guess, we should keep separate items for all three stations (main line (Q3238851), S-Bahn (Q95723) and rapid transit (Q5503)). --MB-one (talk) 09:41, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
  • The items seems to be confused at the moment. In reality the station has 2 S-Bahn tracks, 2 U-Bahn tracks, 2 regular train tracks and at least 2 metro bus stops(I'm not sure from memory whether it's 2 or 4 metro stops). The S-Bahn part and the train part is owned DB Netz (Q896765) but neither buses nor U-Bahn is. ChristianKl❫ 13:25, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
  • To add my (late) comment to this: There are two Jungfernheide stations that not really related physically: the subway station (Jungfernheide metro station (Q19951075)) and the S-Bahn and railway station (Berlin Jungfernheide station (Q22284875)). They have completely separate histories, are separated physically, are run by separate entities, and different laws apply to them (the former is legally a tram station, the latter a railway station). Therefore they should stay separated. On the other hand, it makes sense to have an item like S+U Jungfernheide (Q567079) that combines both items (and possibly the bus stop etc. as well) as a "stop", since from a schedule standpoint, they are treated as one stop. I will remove all duplicated items from S+U Jungfernheide (Q567079) to the other items, though. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 09:44, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
    • I did now restore the proper hierarchy. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:04, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

Q741032[edit]

Trigger point (Q741032): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

It should be merged with myofascial trigger point (Q1956673) as they refer to the same concept. --Nasch92 (talk) 11:31, 3 May 2019 (UTC)

They both have a zh.wp link, can someone native check if that is true they are the same? Q.Zanden questions? 23:37, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 14:50, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
@Lakokat: Please take a look. Thanks in advance! Bencemac (talk) 12:26, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
Bencemac, I suggest to ping editors of both zhwiki articles instead: @Kasuga, Waihorace, Winstonlighter, Wolfch, Kolyma:@Tigerzeng: plus bot operators of bots that edited: @Luckas Blade, Toto Azéro, Addshore, 和平奮鬥救地球, Emaus:, if they agree merging of articles, them let them, but if not, them both should keep normally. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 22:38, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

Q20984678[edit]

eater (Q20984678): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

@Thierry Caro, Sjoerddebruin: I don't think that "eater" is really an occupation, or that pointing to this item with subclass of (P279) or occupation (P106) is the proper way to model that something eats something else. I don't think this item serves any real purpose. Yair rand (talk) 03:28, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 03:30, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
Symbol keep vote.svg Keep. It's OK. Thierry Caro (talk) 04:48, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment @Yair rand: if this is not the proper way, how would you suggest to do it? In particular, I'm thinking about competitive eaters like Molly Schuyler (Q6896676) who do have for principal - and sometimes professional - occupation to be an eater. Until then I would lean towards Symbol keep vote.svg Keep. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 12:20, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
@VIGNERON: One's occupation can be participating in eating competitions, but one's occupation can't be "being an entity that eats". (I see that User:Thierry Caro has created competitive eater (Q63554580) for the actual occupation, which is more accurate.) man-eater (Q1365331) and Cookie Monster (Q1754267) are not modeled in a way that makes sense, though. We have main food source (P1034), though I'm not sure that would work here. --Yair rand (talk) 18:37, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

Q57904781[edit]

Pascale Canova (Q57904781): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Demande de la personne objet de la notice Alain Schneider (talk) 08:08, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:10, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
no more links Alain Schneider (talk) 08:29, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
It is highly irregular for your to remove links, and data, while the item's deletion is being discussed; doubly so as you have declared an apparent conflict of interest. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:05, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep "Request of the person who is the subject of the notice" is not a valid reason for deletion; and is in any case stated without evidence. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:25, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment @Alain Schneider: pourrais-tu donner des détails ? d'où viens la demande de suppression, directement de la concernée ? est-ce publique ? sur quoi cette demande est-elle basée ? etc. Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 10:33, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment @VIGNERON: Cette personne est une collègue de travail qui ne voit pas en quoi des éléments personnels ont à être mis dans une base de données publique. Elle considère que c'est contraire au RGPD et veut s'adresser à la CNIL. J'ai d'ailleurs quasiment vidé (avant que tu ne les remettes) la notice de toute information et enlevé tous les liens Alain Schneider (talk) 19:51, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
      • Indeed, after carefull checking most of these data are not public so I would lean towards Symbol delete vote.svg Delete at the very least and in any case, the history should be purge by an admin. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 15:56, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol delete vote.svg Delete As I understand it the item contains sensitive information that was unfortunately put in. Either the history should be hidden or the item should be entirely deleted. I think the delete option would be best. It is better to be on the safe side concerning sensitive information. Hiding the history may also draw unfortunate Streissand effect attention to the item in question. The item can be created as a new item (with less information) or not based on whether this is appropriate. — Finn Årup Nielsen (fnielsen) (talk) 08:52, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
    • There is a difference between revision-deleting inappropriate claims and deleting a valid item that meets our noatability crteria. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:03, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

I can do the appropriate revdels if someone can email me what revision numbers specifically to revdel and whether the summaries and the contributor names of those revisions should also be hidden. @Fnielsen, VIGNERON, Alain Schneider, Pigsonthewing: Mahir256 (talk) 04:43, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Q31274785[edit]

Q31274785: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There exists Q19597898 Estopedist1 (talk) 18:16, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:20, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
Technically two different names, Q31274785 is a variant for the people who living in Estonia or Finland with the official Latin script, Q19597898 is for citizens of countries with the Cyrillic script as official. I'm not sure there's need on merging even if the names in fact direct equivalents of each other. --Wolverène (talk) 22:07, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

Q18974314[edit]

Q18974314: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Obsolete Magnus Manske (talk) 10:48, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 10:50, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
  • @Magnus Manske: There seem to be a lot of GeneDB ID's for this item. Why do you think they are wrong? ChristianKl❫ 13:15, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

Q31797707[edit]

Q31797707: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

"Poes d' Trouk" is "Zea mays", than to be linked with Q11575 Lucyin (talk) 21:11, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

Q28065731[edit]

duplicated disambiguation page (Q28065731): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs | discussion)

Not sure what it adds. Complicates check for disambiguation. Use Wikimedia disambiguation page (Q4167410) instead --- Jura 18:13, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:20, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support; It is in use in ~900 items as value of instance of (P31), most of them with qualifiers of (P642) that link to the "main" item. I suggest to use Wikimedia disambiguation page (Q4167410) as value for instance of (P31), and add a permanent duplicated item (P2959) statement that links to the main item. Also: @Pasleim: who has created this item. --MisterSynergy (talk) 11:37, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Q56109259[edit]

many sports (Q56109259): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This looks like a lazy attempt to avoid listing all sports of multi-sport events (such as the Olympics) with sport (P641). Per this query, there are some 100 uses to be replaced before this item can be deleted. MisterSynergy (talk) 18:04, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:10, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
If relevant, please see some consensus discussion at Project Sports. Jagulin (talk) 05:14, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

Q63968208[edit]

Kovářová (Q63968208): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No need for this item, only included redirects; this is a feminine version of the name Kovář, no need for it in Wikidata ontology Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 20:43, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 04:40, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

Q60038053[edit]

serving (Q60038053): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Created by User:NMaia for a property proposal which was meanwhile closed by User:ZI Jony as "not done". Do we still need this item?

--MisterSynergy (talk) 10:30, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep even if we’re agreed that product or material produced (P1056) should be used for recipes, we still need “serving” as a unit in cooking. - PKM (talk) 18:42, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
    • How should this item be used as a "unit" in cooking? It is currently unused and undefined. —MisterSynergy (talk) 21:46, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
  • @MisterSynergy: Symbol delete vote.svg Delete this, empty and this will no use to keep. Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 17:38, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

Q63648354[edit]

Category:Mississippi Queen (ship, 1987) (Q63648354): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Created by User:Clemens Stockner for the still-existing Commons category commons:Category:Mississippi Queen (ship, 1987). However, User:Ein Dahmer insists on User talk:Ein Dahmer#Mississippi Queen that this category sitelink should not be linked to the item as there is already commons:Category:ENI 02317978 for the same vessel, linked to Mississippi Queen (Q63676401). How are these cases handled? Also pinging some experienced Wikidata+Commons editors: @Mike Peel, Jarekt, Jheald: thanks for any input. --MisterSynergy (talk) 10:42, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

@Ein Dahmer, MisterSynergy: Sorry, I just spotted this. I haven't figured out what to do here systematically, since there are two Commons categories. My default at the moment would be to either have just one item, linking the ship to commons:Category:ENI 02317978, or if there's also a gallery, then to have two items, one linking to the gallery, one linking to commons:Category:ENI 02317978. Either way, that means that commons:Category:Mississippi Queen (ship, 1987) does not have a link from Wikidata, and hence it doesn't have an infobox, which isn't ideal. You could overload the commons sitelinks, and have one on a category item and one on a topic item, which would work but probably isn't ideal! Perhaps it needs modelling here using something like synonym (Q1040689) for the different ship names, or perhaps Commons' approach to these categories should change, but either way it needs some sort of RfC to sort out systematically. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 11:16, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

Q6799778[edit]

Mbsf (Q6799778): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

The English Wikipedia article (the only sitelink) has been redirected (final revision of article). I would replace this with a lexeme containing the equivalent information. Jc86035 (talk) 16:15, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

@Jc86035: Do you think this might be useful as a unit when adding measurements as statements or qualifiers? Mahir256 (talk) 04:03, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
@Mahir256: While this is vaguely possible (though extremely unlikely to be necessary), I think it would make more sense to use metre (Q11573) as the unit, with a property similar to elevation above sea level (P2044), or otherwise some sort of qualifier indicating this. Jc86035 (talk) 15:39, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

Q20738855[edit]

urban area with a population of 150-199 (Q20738855): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

While this item currently satisfies the structural notability criterion, it seems to be only used on a couple of items as a instance of (P31) value, which might not be appropriate. (The item has no sitelinks and is described as an "inofficial [sic] concept".) Unless the relevant census data is not detailed enough to add the exact values through population (P1082), it should be possible to replace all the uses of this item. Jc86035 (talk) 16:23, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 10 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 16:30, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support - yona b (talk) 08:06, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Q23308924[edit]

IEEE official website (Q23308924): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This item is the "official website" of Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (Q131566). Is there a reason that a website, this one in particular, should be its own item? Senator2029 (talk) 01:07, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 01:10, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
It’s a clearly identifiable entity. I used it in a source statement to state in which website a url that sourced something pointed to (Q23308923#P279. Meets the notabitily policy then, it does not requires any further reason. author  TomT0m / talk page 07:20, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
Symbol keep vote.svg Keep @Senator2029: it's strange but unusual (we have more than 9318 items about website right now) and it's used as a source which is a reason enough to keep. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 17:05, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment – This item is for the organization's homepage which is not useful as a reference URL either on Wikidata or Wikipedia, as those should be specific unique links. @VIGNERON, TomT0m: Senator2029 (talk) 06:09, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
It’s not used as a reference url, so I don’t understand the point. It’s used to explicit the publication location, exactly as for a scientific article we also state the scientific journal in which it is published, even if their is a link to the full article content available online. author  TomT0m / talk page 16:34, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Q66305811[edit]

Ludvík Váša (Q66305811): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Bad source, real name is Ludvík Vašica Skim (talk) 17:05, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

@Skim: could you not just correct the name and source? Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 15:07, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
@VIGNERON: I created this record from Historie učitelských ústavů na Moravě a jejich význam pro současnost (Q66305797), but this bachelor thesis isn't right. I found Zpráva c.k. ústavu ku vzdělání učitelů v Příboře za léta 1875–1899 (Q66305950), where is precise list of directors of school. Second director hasn't this name, but Ludvík Vašica Ludvík Vašica (Q66306493). Source is on many places in this report.
So i can merge this two records, but this one is false, i decided that deleting is better. Skim (talk) 15:45, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
Oh, ok, thanks for the precisions. I would still merge and correct (which is the usual way), I let others give their point of view. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 16:22, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
  • If they are the same person, merge them. Quakewoody (talk) 10:09, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Q1788171[edit]

A.S. Siracusa Calcio 1924 (DEPRECATED) (Q1788171): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There are really a messed up heritage of a football club which multi legal persons claiming as successor. New item had replaced Q1788171 as Associazione Sportiva Siracusa (Q39052565), A.S.D. Città di Siracusa (Q4647072) and U.S. Siracusa (Q28195113). Fourth item to be created for yet another legally unrelated team A.S.D. Città di Siracusa for 2012-13 season. --Matthew hk (talk) 19:33, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 19:40, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Q57076870[edit]

Jim McCarthy (Q57076870): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No information except the name. There are links to this, but that raises another problem: The links are for at least 2, probably 3 different persons. --Andre Engels (talk) 09:42, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 09:50, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

@Magnus Manske: The item was created by your SourceMD tool. Can you explain how the tool reasoned that the three works are by the same author? ChristianKl❫ 17:21, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

This was intended to be Jim McCarthy (1959-), but a link was added from Q20591656, which should link to Jim McCarthy (1955-), for whom VIAF is now using this item as an identifier (and has added the other works). I created a new item Jim McCarthy (Q72674606) (McCarthy born 1959) and started adding to Q57076870 (McCarthy born 1955) before noticing this; it would repurpose the item, but for a purpose already used externally. Peter James (talk) 09:01, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Q59278656[edit]

Delphine Ménard (Q59278656): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs) This should be deleted because I am not notable and I find this encroaches on my privacy, I would be grateful if this was deleted. Thank you --notafish }<';> 15:51, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 16:00, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
@Slaporte, Liuxinyu970226, Robin van der Vliet: Can you explain why you believe that the kind of information you added about the referenced person should be on Wikidata? ChristianKl❫ 17:16, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Symbol keep vote.svg Keep has a valid commonswiki link plus even enough number of statements. @Delphine (WMF): to let she explain more. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 22:33, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment @Liuxinyu970226: notafish is Delphine (WMF), so she already explained herself. Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 08:36, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
@VIGNERON, notafish: If that user really want this item to be deleted, before that we need to nominate c:Category:Delphine Ménard to be deleted. Because, under this criteria, that commons category also violates her privacy. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 21:49, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Acually, I don't think it does in the same way. I am identified in these pictures, but none of those pictures actually invite anyone to add my parents' names, my relatives' names, my date of birth, my nationality or anything that actually encroaches on my privacy. If anything, the commons category helps me actually to protect my privacy by allowing me to track pictures that could be derogatory, or mislabeled. I don't understand how having a category on commons actually makes me notable enough to become an item on Commons. This is a strange relationship between our two projects. Can someone explain to me the rationale before I ask to delete the category on Commons (which, again, I don't think makes me notable in any way) notafish }<';> 15:52, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
I think you should start at Commons to have the category removed, then this becomes empty and that with the lack of notability should suffice to have Q59278656 deleted. - сyсn - (talkcontribslogs) 14:05, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
See my question above. Thanks! notafish }<';> 15:54, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
If you would not be notable, then why is there a need for a category in Commons? A category on Commons may trigger the automatic creation of a item like this, so deleting it while the Commonscat exist may not be a permanent solution. The additional information that encroaches on your privacy can be deleted by someone with sufficient permissions in a way that it cannot simply be reversed by someone of seen in the history of the item. If you cannot of don't want the commonscat deleted, I think that would be the best way to address your issue. - сyсn - (talkcontribslogs) 12:57, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
@notafish:, I looked it up, I think you're best served with this page: Wikidata:Living people. There's a section on privacy violation there. - сyсn - (talkcontribslogs) 13:07, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol delete vote.svg Delete I don't think WMF staff are notable by default nor should their details be stored by default in Wikidata. A sitelink to Commons isn't sufficient for notability either.
    Easiest solution to get this deleted might be to ask HR for it. --- Jura 22:40, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
    @Jura1: Please in the next time, first nominate deletion locally (i.e. Commons:Deletion requests on Commons) first, then here. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:12, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
    • No. I think you didn't read or understand my comment. @Liuxinyu970226: Do not add usernames to Wikidata when you know the user doesn't want it to be added. --- Jura 05:18, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
@Jura1: Should I ask you to re-write by hands yourself a sentence that Cycn said above? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 12:41, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Also I need to mention users that edited commons category to see if that category can be rfded or not: @Sebastian Wallroth, Marcus Cyron, Mike Peel, Varnent, Laurentius:@Mazuritz: (or should this be deleted by a staff member account as office action?) --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 08:37, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep I'm sorry, @Notafish, but I think you are notable enough to have a Wikidata item given the important roles you've had within the Wikimedia movement over the years. Having a Wikidata item shouldn't be an invasion of your privacy: things like names of relations or date of birth should only be added if they have already been published elsewhere. This is the same as anyone else that has a Wikidata item about them, so if this is a problem in this case then it's also a much wider problem that should be addressed. Having information on Wikidata is increasingly important for Commons, with the infobox providing context in the category, and in future the structured data about each photograph, it's a natural relationship rather than a strange one. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 21:17, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
    Mike Peel, would you support an article about me to be on Wikipedia? Probably not. I have great trouble understanding how being part of Wikimedia makes me notable in any way. We don't do this for every one person who had a hand in Facebook, do we? Or in Google? Why would we make an exception for Wikimedia? There are probably no or very very few outside sources (outside of Wikimedia) that mention my name as even being part of Wikimedia and I would never ever pass the notability test on any Wikipedia, even on the most relaxed ones about notability. But because I happen to have volunteered and worked for Wikimedia, I get a Wikidata item on me. Strange. See some of the arguments below that are way more persuasive than just me asking for the deletion. notafish }<';> 10:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
    @Notafish: "would you support an article about me to be on Wikipedia?" - yes, I would. I generally think we should do better at covering Wikimedians than we do for Facebook/Google (and I think we should get better there too). Perhaps there should at least be a 'notable Wikimedians' list based on Listeria in the future, which would use information from Wikidata items like this one. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 10:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
    OK, that is an interesting take on notability standards. I find it to be a way to bias the encyclopedia towards well.. us, which is a bit strange, I must say. Regardless of this conversation here, which is on a very personal level. Thank you for your answer. notafish }<';> 09:06, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

Former board member of Wikimedia Deutschland, an organization, that handle every year millions of €. Because of that there is a Commons Ccategory for very actual and every former board member. So is should be here on Wikidata. Commons and Wikidata have a different understanding of natability. And due to Delphine Ménards other roles in the movement I dcan't see any cause or possibility to delete this. People who reach an adience must accept to be rocogniced. -- Marcus Cyron (talk) 20:34, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

  • @Marcus Cyron: apparently you don't. --- Jura 20:39, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
    People who reach an audience? Was heißt das überhaupt? Jeder, der je in einem Verein gearbeitet hat, sollte ein Wikidata Item haben? Ich sehe mein Engagement in Wikimedia als keinen Grund, dass mich "notable" macht. notafish }<';> 10:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol delete vote.svg Delete - The notability policy section 1.4 states that a Commons category on its own is not enough. Secondly I see no serious and publicly available links given in the item to support notability. Moreover the item is only used ones, and I see no structural need for this item. Finally the subject itself requests deletion. As such it should be deleted. Sincerely, Taketa (talk) 04:38, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
    @Taketa: See Cycn's comments above, a Commons category is already enough for populating an item that meets Notability #2 and #3 rules, anyway, if you really want this item to be deleted, please ask Commons to delete first, or ask trust and safety team to request an office action-based deletion. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:24, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
    PS: I asked T&S yesterday for this item, to see if deletion is possible based on office action or not. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:26, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
    • We have a very specific guideline that says a Commons category as the only interwikilink is not enough for a Wikidata item, which is contrary to what Cycn says. We follow that guideline (1.4). I mentioned above that I see no evidence of noteworth under 2 or 3. The person is an employee. We don;t need 100 employees per large company to have their own item. Please provide evidence of 2 or 3, like articles in secundary neutral sources which are specifically about them. If it is noteworthy under 2 or 3 it doesn;t matter in the slightest what happens to a Commons category. If that were the case it would be notable even without the category. The Commons category does not make a difference under 1,2 or 3. There is no office action required, this is Wikidata, we have admins who can delete under our own guidelines. Sincerely, Taketa (talk) 05:03, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
      • @Taketa:Wikistream (Q39655638) creator (P170) Delphine Ménard (Q59278656), this is already enough to indicate that why Q59278656 is following the third rule of WD:N: It fulfills a structural need, for example: it is needed to make statements made in other items more useful. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
        • I do not consider a single statement a need. Though it could be, in this example I don't consider it a need. Even the guideline uses plural (WD:N 3). Though it is obviously subjective what constitutes a need, and it is only my personal opinion. Sincerely, Taketa (talk) 06:25, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol delete vote.svg Delete - I agree with Jura and Taketa. --E4024 (talk) 03:03, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol delete vote.svg Delete - I can't see what kind of notability that should support an entry in Wikidata in this case. Oleryhlolsson (talk) 17:12, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
    @E4024, Oleryhlolsson: Even used as a creator (P170) value? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:06, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
    Sorry, that's not something I am very knowledgeable about, decide it without my input please. --E4024 (talk) 17:40, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

Q66836070[edit]

Bronwen Chisholm (Q66836070): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non-notable. Fails WD:N. Hiàn (talk) 21:02, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:10, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Symbol keep vote.svg Keep this author seems notable enough per WD:N (critera 2 and 3), @Hiàn: why would you think it's not notable? Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 07:59, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
I have not yet seen enough reliable third-party sources to make the analysis that she would be notable. I fail to see how this is not simply another self-promotion attempt. Hiàn (talk) 14:52, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

Q29876543[edit]

Fubuki (Q29876543): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not a notable character Flixwito^(•‿•)^ 08:30, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:40, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
In the item linking to this, the qualifier "character role = Q29876543", may be replaced with the qualifier "name of the character role = Fubuki". Similar with Q29966666 that nominated below. --Wolverène (talk) 10:43, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
@Wolverène: Done, including those that nominated below. Flixwito^(•‿•)^ 04:12, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

Italian Ministers without Portfolio[edit]

Not existed BohemianRhapsody (talk) 14:06, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

@BohemianRhapsody: could you explain a bit more ? @ValterVB: could you explain why you created/needed this item? Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 15:14, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
@VIGNERON: Literally, Q55178176 means "minister for institutional reforms and for regional affairs". But in Italy we don't have such a minister.
We have a "minister for institutional reforms" (minister for institutional reforms (Q55024178)) and we have a "minister for regional affairs" (Italian Minister of Regional Affairs and Autonomies (Q33125109)).
It has happened three times (from 1988 to 1992) that this two positions were held by the same person, but this doesn't mean that it is a new position and it doesn't mean that we need this item on Wikidata.--BohemianRhapsody (talk) 16:26, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
Ok, thanks @BohemianRhapsody: for the explanation, Symbol delete vote.svg Delete then. Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 09:09, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

Sorry for late replay:

In some cases the name of the ministry changed during the legislature, see the footnotes --ValterVB (talk) 15:03, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose for the time being, i.e. until we find a way to deal with this. Usually, ministers without portfolio (from 1946 on) depend from the Presidency of the Council of Ministers of Italy (Q1740905), and many of the ministries are in fact departments of the presidency that get "promoted" to ministries for some time. I'm available to discuss this, since I've done my fair share of reordering Italian ministers and ministries up to 1946. --Sannita - not just another it.wiki sysop 14:32, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

User talk:Simon Villeneuve/Archives[edit]

  (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs | discussion)

Want to reorganise my archives --Simon Villeneuve (talk) 12:48, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

This is a user talk page that was replaced by Flow; if it is deleted the history should be merged somewhere. Peter James (talk) 17:20, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

Q2107396[edit]

Praesidium (Q2107396): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Conflicts with Q2115302. Both pages relate to the same concept (Praesidium). --LitigiousOx (talk) 08:19, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

presidium (Q2115302) is a subclass of public institution (Q294163); Q2107396 is a disambiguation page. There is another disambiguation page presidium (Q50569257) but I don't know if it should be merged to Q2107396; different spellings are used in the linked pages. Peter James (talk) 17:36, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

Q31497834[edit]

Q31497834: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Corresponding page in Tewiki is redirected Chaduvari (talk) 05:03, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

  • @Chaduvari: It seems to be a place that exists as it is mentioned on the redirection target (no idea what it says there though). I added a P131. --- Jura 12:16, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
    The name is similar, and the redirect is to Bhaskar Nagar (Q4901348), a village. Possibly the same place - I don't know if the ending has any meaning. Peter James (talk) 13:16, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

Q30028540[edit]

Palazzolo Acreide (Q30028540): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

The true item is Palazzolo Acreide (Q489260) --Elyparker (talk) 13:30, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 13:40, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Q18003534[edit]

old and new castle Bümpliz (Q18003534): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Double entry --Jwilderm (talk) 13:31, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 13:40, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
  • This seems to be for a site with two castles and shouldn't have been blanked.[5] There is an item for each castle but the heritage status and identifier are for the combined site. Peter James (talk) 22:09, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
Symbol keep vote.svg Keep per @Peter James:, @Jwilderm: double entry like this one is quite common. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 15:36, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Q66811114[edit]

Q66811114: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty item Trijnstel (talk) 14:29, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Linked to Vangrail (Q2358576), added a source. Edoderoo (talk) 17:03, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 17:10, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
Symbol keep vote.svg Keep @Trijnstel: not empty at all and seems notable for Wikidata (per point 3 of Wd:N). Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 15:27, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Q55096751[edit]

Jesús Ángel Pérez Casas (Q55096751): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Just a name - no information at all Bahnmoeller (talk) 10:15, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 10:20, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
Identifiers at http://viaf.org/viaf/46798042/ may be the same person, also possibly http://www.museodezaragoza.es/homenaje-postumo-a-jesus-angel-perez-casas/ and http://w.aragon.es/estaticos/GobiernoAragon/Departamentos/PoliticaTerritorialJusticiaInterior/Documentos/docs/Areas/Informaci%C3%B3n%20territorial/Publicaciones/Coleccion_Territorio/Comarca_Ribera_Alta_del_Ebro/DOCUMENTOS_BLOQUE_II._DE_LA_HISTORIA._1.pdf with dates of birth and death (6 January 1958 - 9 December 2000). Peter James (talk) 16:18, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep as the author of a WD item, he fits a structural need. Of course, this assumes his work is notable - which isn't my place to say. Quakewoody (talk)

Wikidata:True duplicates/2[edit]

  (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty page; and I see no reason for having two pages about "true duplicates" --Nomen ad hoc (talk) 22:03, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

It used to contain data. It may act as record purposes. Esteban16 (talk) 15:41, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

Q51940267[edit]

cotton broadcloth (Q51940267): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs | discussion)

Already exists as Q1866550 --MS-SPO (talk) 16:30, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 16:40, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
If the English Wikipedia article is correct, it's the same as poplin (Q1141566), not broadcloth (Q1866550), which is another, possibly unrelated, use of the term. Peter James (talk) 18:46, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
@MS-SPO: According to the different from (P1889) in both Q1866550 and Q51940267 they aren't the same and the property even lists a source for that. Also this property prevents the merging of the two. - сyсn - (talkcontribslogs) 07:31, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
Notifying the creator of the alleged duplicate: @PKM:. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 11:15, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
@VIGNERON: thanks for notifying me.
I thought I had made it pretty clear. There two entirely different fabrics called "broadcloth" in the USA. One is a (usually) cotton shirting fabric and the other is the traditional (usually) wool fabric that dates back to the middle ages. The Fairchild's Dictionary of Textiles (Q28888841) has two definitions of "broadcloth". Textile Terms and Definitions (Q52580215) makes the same distinction; the Inter-Active Terminology for Europe (Q1520860) cites this as a definition for "broad-cloth": "Definition: 1) a light-weight fabric of poplin type, used extensively on the North American continent for shirtings. 2) a cloth made from fine woollen yarns in a twill weave,heavily milled(traditionally approximately 90 in.in the loom for 56 in.finished)and given a dress face finish.It is usually dyed in dark colours." I've added the UK name "shirting poplin" (from Fairchild) and I will add the additional source and "name"/"valid in place" statements. - PKM (talk) 18:32, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
I have added the IATE terms for "cotton broadcloth" and "wool broadcloth" as other language labels for these two items, and I've changed the default EN label to "cotton broadcloth" to make the distinction clear. [Edited] - PKM (talk) 19:01, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
Symbol keep vote.svg Keep In case that wasn't obvious. :-) - PKM (talk) 19:11, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

Q29640788[edit]

Os Keyes (Q29640788): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

The item contains sensitive information that was unfortunately put in (by me, I believe). Either the history should be hidden or the item should be entirely deleted. I think the delete option would be best. It is better to be on the safe side concerning sensitive information. See also the discussion for Q57904781 where I made a similar argument. --Finn Årup Nielsen (fnielsen) (talk) 08:58, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

@Alain Schneider, Pigsonthewing, VIGNERON: You are the only ones discussing Q57904781. — Finn Årup Nielsen (fnielsen) (talk) 09:00, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment what the point of view of the person themself? Anyway, I'm more leaning toward Symbol delete vote.svg Delete Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 10:06, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
    • For information, I asked directly to them and they said "I would like it deleted." so definitely a Symbol delete vote.svg Delete for me. Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 16:02, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep. Any inappropriate additions should of course be revision-deleted (which requires admin tools), but the item is sourced to valid external identifiers, and so meets our notability requirements. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:01, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 09:10, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
  • I can do the appropriate revdels if someone can email me what revision numbers specifically to revdel and whether the summaries and the contributor names of those revisions should also be hidden. Mahir256 (talk) 04:10, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep - keep the item because it passes a structural need and etc. And unless WD has a policy (including BLP) regarding the name/gender changes, we should also keep Oliver and male. If they are no longer valid, we depreciate them, not remove them. You can change the future, but you can't erase history, meaning its name at birth was Oliver. That is a historical fact, it needs to be kept. And it didn't decide to be a "they" until recently, it was a male for quite some time, including a time which was prior to the invention of "they" as a term. You can't claim to be a "they" if "they" didn't exist. Quakewoody (talk) 10:34, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Q68199391[edit]

Catalogue of nebulae in Crux, Centaurus, Circinus and Norma. (Q68199391): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Spurious entry. GZWDer (talk) 18:12, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

Seems to be some other publication, rather than a journal, which explains its non-standard bibcode, but title and publisher are stated. Peter James (talk) 20:13, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

Q51417962[edit]

Q51417962: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Double with the Q51405496 item. I made some corrections before, now it is not necessary to keep two times the same topic. --Givet (talk) 05:20, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

Givet: They have different identifiers. How can they be the same? Esteban16 (talk) 00:43, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
Esteban16: You are right, at the beginning it is two scans on BHL of the same book (in fact two different "physical" objets - one of them with a complement to the author's name) so, OK, we refer here to these two scans but is it really important to have this double entry. There was many errors on these Wikidata pages and, of course, it is more difficult to complete perfectly two articles instead of one. But why not. Thank you very much for your comment and sorry for the inconvenience. Have a nice day :-) Givet (talk) 05:19, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

Q16445677[edit]

Benjaminas Kordušas (Q16445677): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Lacks ref, sitelink not about person: moved to Q68802066 --- Jura 15:23, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Why was the sitelink, which was there first, moved and not the statements added later? Peter James (talk) 16:06, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
Because Wikidata doesn't repurpose items and there may be people named that way. --- Jura 16:27, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
Which is why it should be restored to its original purpose before it was repurposed. Peter James (talk) 16:33, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
Often, on creation, items are blank and one could argue that this should be restored and then the item used for something new. However, users of the final product would get disrupted.--- Jura 16:39, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
Items with sitelinks are not blank. If an item is blank or it isn't possible to determine what it was intended to be about, then it should be deleted. In this case it was already known what it was about but an incorrect statement was added. Peter James (talk) 18:26, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
Also for users of the final product it would be more useful to know we still have information on this, but that it was not a person; also to confirm that the original Q16445677 is the same as Q68802066 it would be necessary to check edit histories and logs, as sitelinks are not stable identifiers. Peter James (talk) 19:26, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
If it was about a person and now should be about a film, the QID wouldn't be stable.
You suggest we "salt" this in some way? I don't see the usefulness of keeping a QID that was incorrectly defined. --- Jura 12:36, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
I agree with @Peter James:, merging is the right solution here, the Qid would be back to it's original purpose. Te repurposing into a human (Q5) seems to be a mistake (ping @Holger1959: for confirmation). Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 14:41, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Well, there is a person with that name, but he just not notable, at least as far as I can tell. Reusing it for something else, would be against the general principle of Wikidata not to repurpose items. You can't repurpose items just because someone agrees to it .. --- Jura 17:47, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Cases like this is why I advocate for "disambiguation" items. It acknowledges that the item exists in case other databases have already linked to it, but also acknowledges our own errors which would then serve to correct the data on here and on the places that have linked to it.
Meaning - Joe Website linked to this item for Person 2. If we simply correct our data back to Person 1, Joe Website makes it look like Person 1 should have the information as Person 2. And then a future editor re-populates the information. So, instead, we state - you are probably looking for one of these items (which represent Person 1 and 2).
yes, that is the problem with data, it becomes circular and then wrong data becomes harder to correct. You cite A as a source to add it to B, B is used as a source for C, and the C is cited as a source for B. Quakewoody (talk)

Q66870987[edit]

Kelly Morgan (Q66870987): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No sitelinks, links from other items, or other indication of notability Jamie7687 (talk) 13:06, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep, but a weak keep, based on notability. I added data to the item. She is a "d-list" star on the teen circuit. Not a major icon, but is being publicized. It is just hard to find her specific hits because her name is so common as it can be written both forwards and backwards (Morgan Kelly/Kelly Morgan) and it is both male and female, then add in the fact that "teen" results get pushed down the list behind "top 20 name matches on linkedin" or the sports star or the actor, and so forth. Quakewoody (talk) 00:39, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 00:10, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Q25485334[edit]

Arja Lee (Q25485334): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not sure why this got repurposed/redirect. Item for actor is at Q61088477 --- Jura 11:26, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

It was originally about the actor.[6] Peter James (talk) 00:24, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Cases like this is why I advocate for "disambiguation" items. It acknowledges that the item exists in case other databases have already linked to it, but also acknowledges our own errors which would then serve to correct the data on here and on the places that have linked to it.

Q2072351[edit]

Q2072351: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Q2072351 has a swedish and a german article about the "Freedom of Movement" of natural persons. So they belong to Q1344824 which is somehow blocked by at least the german "Niederlassungsfreiheit" which is wrong in place as it is about movement of persons and organisations. --5glogger (talk) 08:26, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

Historic Scotland redundant items[edit]

The items listed under subheadings, below, relate to components of a Historic Environment Scotland listing - http://portal.historicenvironment.scot/designation/LB29261 "2-36 (EVEN NOS) LONDON STREET, INCLUDING RAILINGS AND LAMPS LB29261" (at least by virtue of having a Historic Scotland ID (P709) value of LB29261).

LB29261 is described on wikidata in the following ten items, following the approach taken for the remaining 70k HS items, and consistent with detailed data released by HS at- http://portal.historicenvironment.scot/spatialdownloads

The six items below, each of which has ~7 coordinates within it, do not mesh with the HS decomposition of LB29261, and are not required insofar as LB29261 is adaquately described in the ten items identified above.

I'm at around 300k edits into curation of Historic Scotland items, meaning I have my head well around the data; I'm thoroughly convinced this set should be deleted. --Tagishsimon (talk) 21:21, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

  • Edinburgh, 12 London Street (Q17575442): Symbol keep vote.svg Keep doesn't strike me as redundant as it's for a specific building, even if that is part of a group. The same applies probably to the others above as well. --- Jura 18:03, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
@Jura1: I'm not asking for Edinburgh, 12 London Street (Q17575442) to be deleted. It is the records below that are the deletion request. If we could concentrate on them, that would be useful. --Tagishsimon (talk) 17:48, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
@Tagishsimon: Ok. Could you use the usual format for deletion requests: item(s) to be deleted then motivation. --- Jura 05:23, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

Q17575417[edit]

2-36 (even numbers) London Street, Edinburgh (Q17575417): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Q17575422[edit]

Q17575422: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Q17575425[edit]

Q17575425: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Q17575429[edit]

Q17575429: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Q17575432[edit]

Q17575432: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Q17575422[edit]

10 London Street, 8, Edinburgh (Q17575439): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

The first of these was created with coordinates for numbers 30, 36, 22-24, 32-34, 26-28, 16-18 and 12, and they were probably intended to be the first six of these; new items were created later. Peter James (talk) 00:14, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
Possibly so. But the question is what to do with them now. --Tagishsimon (talk) 18:08, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
They can be deleted. Peter James (talk) 12:50, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
Q17575417 now has a label for the combined listing. Q17575439 also has a label, which would make it an incorrect duplicate of an item it was not intended to be (the bot had already created an item for numbers 8 and 10 before these errors). Peter James (talk) 11:33, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

Q70117211[edit]

Quadient (Q70117211): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Is this entity notable? EugeneZelenko (talk) 19:57, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:00, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
Yes. Yes it is. Alexis Jazz please ping me if you reply 21:26, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
Anyone other than the creator of the item have an opinion? Quakewoody (talk) 21:39, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
@Quakewoody: We could ask the French? w:fr:Neopost is theirs. @47dp, Eneljay, Alexfouch:? Btw, this is the reason Eugene is doing this. Well that, and probably this. - Alexis Jazz please ping me if you reply 21:44, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Is it a new entity or just a new name? Peter James (talk) 11:42, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
@Peter James: New name, new logo, new website, merge, change in organization. ("notamment en passant d'une structure de holding à une organisation intégrée et plus ciblée", Google translate: "moving from a holding structure to an integrated and more focused organization") "Quadient combines the capabilities of three Neopost sister companies, GMC Software, Human Inference and Satori Software into one technology portfolio of solutions designed to improve customer experience across print, digital and social channels." Alexis Jazz please ping me if you reply 15:58, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Could you kindly provide some reliable reference URL's for statements, in order to make us free at all from any doubts about notability? --Wolverène (talk) 05:56, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

@Wolverène: w:fr:Neopost isn't enough? Eugene doesn't do any research. Never. He's not interested. He calls the notability of anything into question. He only started this deletion request to bring Commons drama over here. - Alexis Jazz please ping me if you reply 18:47, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
Alexis Jazz: You're just causing more drama with your controversial comments. These sources state that "Neopost" changed its name to "Quadient". w:fr:Neopost says the same, but it hasn't been renamed, which I assume is because the company name change is in progress or is not official yet. If I am right, only one item should exist, merging Quadient (Q70117211) with Neopost (Q1977631). But if you say they're different entities, I would like you to demonstrate it. Esteban16 (talk) 22:45, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
@Esteban16: Do I understand correctly you want to delete it and then undelete it once the name change is official? Or if you are just asking for the difference (besides the obvious): Quadient includes d:Q20878537. (and some other stuff that doesn't have a Wikidata item) Neopost does not. - Alexis Jazz please ping me if you reply 22:53, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Alexis Jazz: I want you to clarify whether they're different entities or not. You said above that it was a "new name, new logo, new website, merge, change in organization", and I didn't get that at all. If they're different, it is okay, but if they're the same, then merging should be done. Esteban16 (talk) 23:00, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
As they're different, can this be closed and kept? Alexis Jazz please ping me if you reply 12:00, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

Q68825631[edit]

Journal of Marine Engineering & Technology Pack (Q68825631): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Mistake: a pack is not a revue Manu1400 (talk) 00:09, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

Journal of Marine Engineering & Technology Pack Online (Q68825636) is similar; the journal is Journal of Marine Engineering and Technology (Q62698055) for both print and online. Peter James (talk) 18:17, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

Q3595829[edit]

Bahauddeen Kooriyad (Q3595829): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs | discussion)

I think the name, Bahauddeen Kooriyad is the second name of Bahauddeen Muhammed Nadwi. Wikipedia articles written about him were deleted early. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Bahauddeen_Muhammed_Nadwi Kutyava (talk) 10:48, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

@Kutyava: The Bengali page still exists, but is now linked to Q71200674, and the Urdu and Arabic articles also exist, but are not linked to any Wikidata item. Probably notable as vice-chancellor (Q19542123) of Darul Huda (Q3595823). Peter James (talk) 12:11, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
The statements need checking for accuracy, I removed a date of death that wasn't verified and was probably false, and there are two dates of birth currently stated. Peter James (talk) 14:39, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Historic Scotland redundant items 2[edit]

The items listed under subheadings, below, relate to components of a Historic Environment Scotland listing - http://portal.historicenvironment.scot/designation/LB25075 "73-99 (ODD NOS) COMMERCIAL STREET/15, 17 MEADOWSIDE/2-10 (EVEN NOS) MURRAYGATE" (at least by virtue of having a Historic Scotland ID (P709) value of LB25075).

LB25075 is described on wikidata in the following six items, following the approach taken for the remaining 70k HS items, and consistent with detailed data released by HS at- http://portal.historicenvironment.scot/spatialdownloads

The three items below, each of which has ~3 coordinates within it, do not mesh with the HS decomposition of LB25075, and are not required insofar as LB25075 is adaquately described in the ten items identified above.

I'm at around 320k edits into curation of Historic Scotland items, meaning I have my head well around the data; I'm thoroughly convinced the set below should be deleted. --Tagishsimon (talk) 18:05, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Q17575430[edit]

Dundee, 85-87 Commercial Street, Commercial Bank (Q17575430): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Q17575431[edit]

Dundee, 73 Commercial Street (Q17575431): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Q17575433[edit]

Q17575433: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

*They can be deleted, the correct items are Q17902833, Q17902836, Q17902839. Peter James (talk) 11:27, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

  • These are now the correct items; the Q1790... items have been merged into them. Peter James (talk) 22:53, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

Q64852607[edit]

Connor Blakley (Q64852607): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Does not meet the notability policy David (talk) 13:38, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

  • I haven't looked into how much of this is real and original content, but I find enough magazine articles written about him to qualify for Wikipedia article notability. Why not Wikidata? Quakewoody (talk) 14:24, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
Updated thoughts - After spending a few minutes on Google. I am not sure how most of his hits would fit into a Wikidata item. But I definitely think he has notability. Quakewoody (talk) 14:52, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
  • For me a motivational speaker with ~2.500 followers at Twitter sounds a bit funny but actually the item meets the policy - there is one reference IRL (Forbes). I'd love to see some more references added, and the item can be kept. --Wolverène (talk) 14:36, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
Prior to the nomination, someone removed a few pieces of data from the item - including the reference to the Forbes article. I have since restored them and added a few more. Quakewoody (talk) 14:52, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

Q71286694[edit]

Canadian Pulp and Paper Association (Q71286694): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Blank item after OpenRefine import bug --Vdelavenne (talk) 20:01, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:10, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
I added some identifiers. It seems to be a former name of Forest Products Association of Canada (Q5469083) - should it be merged? Peter James (talk) 21:33, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Keep (1st choice), merge (2nd choice). @Peter James: VIAF treats the predecessor and successor organizations as two separate entities: [7][8]. Perhaps model the predecessor relationship like Golden State Warriors (Q157376) and its various predecessors? Deryck Chan (talk) 14:28, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Q72387701[edit]

Mozilla Festival 2019 (Q72387701): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Does not meet the notability policy David (talk) 14:43, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It's an important festival held every year and attracts significant number of participants from across the world. John Samuel (talk) 14:59, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  • "Important festival" is debatable. But regardless, the question is does it meet Wikidata Notability. I think not. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete
Also worth noting, I am not sure how the image linked from Wikicommons is relevant to the Wikidata item. That looks more like a picture of a person, not a festival. Quakewoody (talk) 15:29, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
So what about Mozilla Festival (Q38236899)? Wondering whether it is notable or not? John Samuel (talk) 17:00, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
And now there's two of them? Quakewoody (talk)
Mozilla Festival 2019 (Q72387701) is an instance of Mozilla Festival (Q38236899) (an approach followed by several conferences). Also Mozilla Festival 2019 (Q72387701) is currently linked to several other persons through speaker (P823). John Samuel (talk) 17:24, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Q27590121[edit]

Marilyn Chambers' Private Fantasies 4 (Q27590121): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There was the Italian article but since that it was deleted. No references except the itwp, no interwikis, nothing justifies the structural need, but two identifiers included (IMDb & IAFD, nothing special). Very typical adult film, I doubt it was reviewed or awarded for example. I'm ready to expand it though, if it will be suddenly classified as notable enough for Wikidata. Wolverène (talk) 08:56, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

  • Apparently, it's being used in list of similar films, e.g. at http://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?oldid=1046298559 . I don't have much of an opinion about the film, but apparently it would be recreated once we get closer to IMDb. --- Jura 09:30, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
    • This list is of temporary usage, I'll eliminate it in some days. Are you thinking IMDb identifier will be enough in a future? Not a secret it is able for user-editing, similar to wiki-powered sites. --Wolverène (talk) 10:27, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
  • I don't think anyone is questioning the notability of Marilyn Chambers. So, then the question is, do we need an item for every film she ever made. Even if the Private Fantasies series made it, would we have an item for each movie in the series. Quakewoody (talk) 10:43, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

Q30026267[edit]

Gualdo Tadino (Q30026267): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

In Italy there isn't the concept of "chief town of municipality" Dega180 (talk) 17:04, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

Item has a sitelink, it needs to be handled locally on cebwiki first.-- Hakan·IST 07:32, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 17:20, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Gualdo Tadino (Q20457) is the municipality that contains Stazione Gaifana (Q18494098); Gualdo Tadino (Q30026267) is the place 6 km north of Stazione Gaifana (Q18494098). Statements can be changed or items merged if that is preferred. Peter James (talk) 15:13, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Q1728994[edit]

Karataş (Q1728994): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs | discussion)

This item was wrongly opened as a "given name" item while it is a "surname" and I already opened that item. No need for a wrong entry. Thanks. E4024 (talk) 00:53, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

I understand it was opened by a bot, based on a wrong entry in DE:WP, which is about the "surname" Karataş, not "given name". (There is no such given name.) --E4024 (talk) 00:55, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 01:00, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Thanks to bots we have this problem here. --E4024 (talk) 01:48, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
When the item was created it was stated to be both a given name and a surname. Peter James (talk) 15:31, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Whatever. There is no such given name and the DE:WP corrected its mistake. --E4024 (talk) 23:06, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Having looked at the de.wp and en.wp pages linked from Karataş (Q398124), I'm convinced by E4024's evidence that Q1728994 was created by mistake. Its statements are wrong (it is not a Turkish given name) and it has no sitelinks, so it should be deleted. Deryck Chan (talk) 10:45, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
Yes, similar absurdity. Now I must confess I contributed to this mess simply because I thought DE:WP could be a serious place and did not question my initial amazement about having such strange given names in my mother tongue. It did not pass through my mind, at the beginning, that they could be confusing given and family names. I just thought "Vay beee we have real strange given names in my language!" :) P.D. "Vay bee" is an exclamation of surprise vis-a-vis absurd things in Turkish; I would never take seriously a site with that name. --E4024 (talk) 10:36, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
It wasn't created by mistake, it was for the German Wikipedia page, and was for both surname and given name. Peter James (talk) 11:10, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
German WP, like other WPs, is not a reliable source; especially on issues related to Turks. One (me) thinks having lived together (I mean side by side :) with them for so many years now in Berlin and elsewhere, the Germans would know Turks better than the Japanese do, but my personal experience showed me that they do not. Whatever; there is no such given name. Would you like to name your son or daughter "Black stone"? (That is Karataş.) --E4024 (talk) 14:10, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
No item for the name but there is William Blackstone Hubbard (Q18739704), also we seem to be using given name and surname for names other than birth names, such as Jet Black (Q3177775) (presumably a stage name and unrelated to the Dutch name). Peter James (talk) 15:17, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep per WD:N #2. --- Jura 22:38, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

Q71634566[edit]

Afifa Afrin (Q71634566): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No sitelinks, links from other third party sources, or other indication of notability. Sorry. ~Moheen (keep talking) 06:33, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 4 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 06:40, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
আরে? আপনার বিভিন্ন তৈরীকৃত আইটেমগুলোর সম্বন্ধে এই অভিযোগটা দেওয়া যায়। এবং যতদুর জানি অন্যান্য বাঙালি অবদানকারী বা স্প্যামাররা আপনার উদাহরণ দেখে তাদের নিজের আইটেমকে রক্ষা করতে চায়। Mahir256 (talk) 02:52, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
@Moheen: Mahir256 (talk) 16:43, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Comment: the items that link to her are also nominated for deletion. Quakewoody (talk) 11:34, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Q69659100[edit]

B. (Q69659100): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Per discussion on Community Portal last week. It was decided that it's not worthwhile to create "author" items for articles with unknown authors if they're only signed with some non-distinctive signature. I would like to now delete this item, created this item, for the signature for "A Ramble in the Forest of Dean," which was created before that discussion. --Levana Taylor (talk) 07:23, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 19:20, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Further clarification: the discussions I was referring to are archived here and here.
@Jura1: please comment if you oppose this deletion ... Levana Taylor (talk) 20:18, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Yes, I think it should be kept as it meets WD:N, notably #3. I don't subscribe to the point of view that only authors found in VIAF or another catalogue should have items.
As you identified the two persons who could be this person, why not add that information to the item? Wikidata is built by incrementally growing items.
Items also facilitates its use as a multilingual resource. --- Jura 07:32, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
"you identified the two persons who could be this person" -- on the contrary, it could easily be yet a third person, and I think there's about a .01% chance we'll ever know any more. In fact, B. might not even be the contributor's real initial (given name or surname). I'm scanning through my Once a Week database (which I'm in the process of transferring to Wikidata) and find the following: article by Thomas Low Nichols signed "J.," by Isabella Percy signed "L.," by Harriet Martineau signed "V.," by Alexander Charles Fraser signed "W." ....
As for fulfilling a structural need -- it would be a fairly radical policy to say that every written work should have an author item, if that's what you're proposing. For consistency that would have to include ones that have no signature at all to refer to them by (let's be real, a single initial hardly provides any more information than nothing at all). --Levana Taylor (talk) 17:56, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • I'll tell you what we do on another site - we add the unknown writer (because it is a structural need). But we don't populate "maybe" information to the entry. If 'B. Johnson' wrote paper-x, we add B. Johnson and use disambiguation "wrote paper-x". We don't credit 3 different B. Johnson's as maybe the writer. It either stays "B. Johnson (wrote paper-x)" forever, or eventually someone finds something out. You would sometimes be amazed at how finding just 1 piece of data leads to solving the rest of the puzzle.
But, again, that is a different site with its own site of rules. Quakewoody (talk)
That's how I've been handling authors with names like "Mrs. Davis." (I could tell a case-in-point story about "how finding just 1 piece of data leads to solving the rest of the puzzle," involving identifying "Miss E. Waring," but that'd be a digression.) But as I said, wouldn't it be a change of direction for Wikidata to specify that all written works must have an author item, even if it contains literally no other info than that this nameless, signatureless person wrote article x? I can see a structural argument for it, but that arguemtn should be made elsewhere than here. Levana Taylor (talk) 19:03, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol delete vote.svg Delete use unknown with qualifier stated as (P1932) like it was done by @Hsarrazin: [9]. --Pasleim (talk) 17:17, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol delete vote.svg Delete - same - these "void" authors are a real problem, because anyone could add them to another item with the same "unknown" signature... while they are not the same authors... --Hsarrazin (talk) 18:45, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Q1805489[edit]

Taşdemir (Q1805489): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs | discussion)

There is no such given name (Vorname) in Turkish. The item was wrongly opened as "Vorname" in DE:WP (corrected now) and a bot opened this page here. I mean the wrong item. Please delete it and do not get confused by bots. E4024 (talk) 23:12, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 23:20, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
I hope we do not leave things to bots here. Right? --E4024 (talk) 01:13, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • @Qaswa: what do you think? We imported this from dewiki where it seems to come from your edit de:Special:Diff/109960977. Obviously if the reference supports it should stay. --- Jura 13:37, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
Hello, yes, Taşdemir IS a given name for males too, but the first source is sometimes not available, and therefore I added another source for the given name now : Taşdemir (German). Qaswa (talk) 15:21, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
In the en:WP there are Turkish names very often only stated as a "surname" even if they are given names, too. Qaswa (talk) 15:28, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
Vay beee! Is that your source? I guess you are not a Turkish speaking person. If you knew what "Vay beee" means you would now be exclaming "Vay beee" and laughing like I do. :=) --E4024 (talk) 16:11, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
I hope you had a good laugh --- but fact is it is another source for the given name, and that's what was asked for. Qaswa (talk) 18:12, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
I'm still laughing and waiting for you to find some "normal" people with that given name; not necessarily males, females are also welcome. Regards. --E4024 (talk) 00:38, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
I added both references to the item. --- Jura 11:15, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
Have you had a chance to look at my contributions so far? I work generally on personal names and until today have opened many given, family and "both" name items. The problem here is there is no such given name. So simple. --E4024 (talk) 14:03, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
Apparently we have two references for the contrary. In this case, we should use Help:Ranking of statements to avoid re-doing this once a week. --- Jura 14:10, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
Apparently we are discussing in vain as I am the only one who knows Turkish here (apparently :) and more than apparently the so called sources do not impress me. Therefore as minority opinion I will not lose more time on this. Do whatever you like. BTW you should have seen the discussion about the Turkish footballer "Canavar Burhan" (Burhan the monster :) in DE and another WP. Some ridiculous source had written his surname as Sargun instead of Sargın, and I had a hard time convincing people to come to my side. (After all I was a friend of the family and that is "original research". I'm sure if I had taken a photocopy of his passport and provided them, they would have requested me to first publish this photocopy in a scholarly article. :) --E4024 (talk) 15:32, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Is the Turkish Language Association reference misunderstood or does it support the statement? --- Jura 11:00, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • I had no intentions to return to this discussion but am not sure if Jura is making a question to me. My final reply to any questions is "First find a person, even if not notable to have a WD item, whose first name is Taşdemir and then ask me to create the item (again). Adios. --E4024 (talk) 13:30, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep per WD:N #2 --- Jura 22:36, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

Q35558101[edit]

Environmental Migration, Adaptation, and Gender Relations: A Study in Dhaka (Q35558101): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No sitelinks, links from other third party sources, or other indication of notability. ~Moheen (keep talking) 14:35, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 14:40, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Comment: The only item that links here belongs to the author. The author and the 3 other items that connect to her are also nominated for deletion. Quakewoody (talk) 11:36, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Q71647580[edit]

Urbanization and Working Women (Q71647580): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No sitelinks, links from other third party sources, or other indication of notability. ~Moheen (keep talking) 14:36, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 14:40, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Comment: The only item that links here belongs to the author. The author and the 3 other items that connect to her are also nominated for deletion. Quakewoody (talk) 11:37, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Q71649336[edit]

'Self-esteem’ and Harmony between Self-esteem and Care Policy in the light of Feminist Interpretation (Q71649336): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No sitelinks, links from other third party sources, or other indication of notability. ~Moheen (keep talking) 14:36, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 14:40, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Comment: The only item that links here belongs to the author. The author and the 3 other items that connect to her are also nominated for deletion. Quakewoody (talk) 11:37, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Q71650474[edit]

Uterus Tale: Is Reproduction Technology Allows a Woman to Control her own Uterus? (Q71650474): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No sitelinks, links from other third party sources, or other indication of notability. ~Moheen (keep talking) 14:36, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 14:40, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Comment: The only item that links here belongs to the author. The author and the 3 other items that connect to her are also nominated for deletion. Quakewoody (talk) 11:37, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Q74031211[edit]

Antoine Tannous (Q74031211): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty item David (talk) 15:31, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

  • This isn't my area of knowledge. But I would like someone to see this article (and others) to see what they think and if there is any usable data about the person to fill into their item. Quakewoody (talk)
The article is about Patrick Baz. Baz can be considered notable. --E4024 (talk) 16:35, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
Try this again - this article. It's one of those web pages where if you scroll to far, the address automatically updates. That's why I linked the wrong one earlier. Quakewoody (talk) 18:52, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

Q73459489[edit]

Jannati Nabiha Nur (Q73459489): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No sitelinks, links from other third party sources, or other indication of notability. Ibrahim Husain Meraj (talk) 18:21, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

  • I don't know if it equals notability, but there are plenty of hits on her, as well as authority control items. Quakewoody (talk)
  • @Ibrahim Husain Meraj, Moheen: আপনারা দুজন এইভাবে যুদ্ধ করতে চাচ্ছেন কেন? Mahir256 (talk) 02:55, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

Q60320748[edit]

Category:Audio files about people by name (Q60320748): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Does not meet the notability policy David (talk) 20:09, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

If this is deleted, and the Commons category is added back to "Category:People by name", would the bot that created this item create a new item for it? Peter James (talk) 10:50, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

@Mike Peel: - Would you please comment on this, since your bot created this item? Deryck Chan (talk) 11:04, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

That bot script is not currently running, and it wouldn't recreate it anyway unless it's added back to "Category:People by name". However, my preference is that every Commons category has a Wikidata item, so I'd prefer keeping this as long as the Commons category exists. A second However, though, is that this category doesn't have many files in it, so perhaps it's a duplicate category tree - @Pigsonthewing: do you know where the spoken voice samples are stored on Commons? Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 11:08, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
@Mike Peel: That would be c:Category:Voice intro project and sub-cats. I would not want to see those categories polluted with all the files from the nominated category; but see also c:Category:Audio files about the human voice etc. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:21, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

Q28058380[edit]

Dimitris Koulias (Q28058380): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability unclear. --1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 18:58, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 19:00, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
Forgive my poor translation - he is the head of a football team. He is listed in the infobox of the WP article. So I think that means he meets a structural need. Quakewoody (talk)

Q58942514[edit]

Bally Municipal Corporation (Q58942514): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no Municipal Corporation for Bally. Bally is a municipality. Bodhisattwa (talk) 09:41, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 09:50, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Q58942514 is the local government; Bally municipality (Q58954409) is the area for which it is the local government. There is no information about where this is, but it may be a duplicate - there is already Bally Municipality (Q19882226), which is labelled "municipality" but is the local government, not the area - unless there is more than one municipality called Bally, Q58942514 should be merged with it. Peter James (talk) 12:03, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Agree, this should be merged with Bally Municipality (Q19882226) instead. --jacksonj04 (talk) 12:14, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

Q4841501[edit]

Bagci (Q4841501): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs | discussion)

My rationale is at the TP of the item; no reactions until now. E4024 (talk) 19:32, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

 Not done - The item contains a valid sitelink to a page on Wikipedia. As per the notability policy it can have an item. If you want to delete the item, you will first have to have the enwiki page deleted locally. Sincerely, Taketa (talk) 20:52, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Taketa and others, the only valid link there is to a "Bağcı" and not "Bagci". The other two are red links due to deletion on notability and those two also are "Bağcı", not "Bagci". I cannot edit the famous En:WP, because I have been fired from there, among other reasons for also pointing out to stupidities like this one. I think people in some WPs get disturbed by people who make them see their mistakes... Regards. --E4024 (talk) 22:08, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Several items with this name in Wikidata. Some should be Bağcı, but it looks like at least one, Ulaş Bağcı (Q41194635), is Bagci. Peter James (talk) 22:27, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for showing me a wrong entry to correct, that of "Ulaş Bağcı". --E4024 (talk) 22:46, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
His name is Bagci according to the identifiers, as well as the University of Central Florida, papers on arxiv.org, and Twitter - how he spells his own name isn't wrong and shouldn't be corrected. Peter James (talk) 23:31, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Agree, spelling should be based on available references about a person, not some own original research. --- Jura 22:45, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Merge. Bagci (Q4841501) is only linked to 2 items: Hakan Bagci (Q60533025) is also known as Hakan Bağcı [10][11], Ibrahim Ethem Bagci (Q61612124) is also known as Bağcı, İbrahim Ethem [12][13]. The wider discussion that needs to be had is how we store names of people who have language-dependent names. Do we stick to one language? Do we store all the forms used by the person? Do we include translations in reliable sources? Deryck Chan (talk) 10:52, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep different spellings get different items. --- Jura 10:58, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
    • Both researchers (Q60533025 & Q61612124) are Turks by nationality, no matter where they are based, we can call them Bağcı according to the native spelling. Not all catalogues allow diactritic (I don't know if the bot that created items about those reseachers takes account of diacritics as well), and not every contributor may have wish to inscribe the name as in passport, in order to not to confuse people for example. So for me it's not quite about differencies in spelling. --Wolverène (talk) 12:52, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Jura they are not different spellings; they are names of people with "strange" letters of Turkish whose names have had to be written differently here and there. Have you ever seen any American or British newspaper writing Recep Tayyip Erdoğan? They all write "Erdogan". So that is an "alias" and not the correct "label" for these and other Turkish names. --E4024 (talk) 13:12, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
    • Americans can use that name too. Try to convince them that they can't spell their last name ;). Anyways, Wikidata just follows the reference and then applies ranking. We don't need to delete stuff based on current or future consensus about "truth". --- Jura 16:13, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Deryck Chan, although I opened this as a deletion request, I understand we agree on what has to be done. Bagci can be an alias for Bağcı, although I personally prefer to use aliases not in the "name" items but at the items of the concerned "people". For example: Ulaş Bağcı (label), Ulas Bagci (alias). That is a need in non-Turkish alphabet-based places, to reach the items easily. Thanks. --E4024 (talk) 13:18, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
    • Scopus uses the name "Bagci, Ulas" (as does the subject) but uses Bağcı for the other two. Peter James (talk) 16:42, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Wolverène, of course I agree with and appreciate your contribution to this discussion. Thanks. --E4024 (talk) 14:02, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Deryck Chan, even though I said above ""Bagci can be an alias for Bağcı, I personally prefer to use aliases not in the "name" items but at the items of the concerned "people" etc"" because in Turkish we have personal names which are different and independent, although the difference is only a dot or two of the alphabet, like the given names "Sina" and "Sına". You cannot make these names "same", they are not. This is why I practice the following in WD: Try to have "Latin alphabet aliases" for people with Turkish alphabet names but have their "name" entries separately. I will look around now, and if I see someone notable enough with the name "Sına" I will open a new entry for Sına (given name). We do have "Sina". --E4024 (talk) 19:27, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • (Reply to myself) I could not find a notable person with the name Sına, but we have them among us; one is Uncle Sına, son of Azmiye Hami Güven. (They are familiars of mine.) Having said that, we have the Turkish given names Ergun and Ergün, being separated buy only the dots on a "u" letter, but having totally different meanings. Regards. --E4024 (talk) 13:29, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Taketa can you revise your previous stance please? Thanks. --E4024 (talk) 01:21, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
  • The item is used in several Wikidata items and should in no situation be deleted. At maximum it could be redirected, depending on whether or not these two names are different or the same. You do not need an admin for redirecting. In my opinion things are fine now and should be left as is. Sincerely, Taketa (talk) 04:15, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
  • The two examples given by Deryck Chan above as having reference to both forms are Turkish people with a Turkish surname (Bağcı) and the "Bagci" label has been added to their names after this discussion began. I will make the necessary corrections in their items, i.e. use Bağcı in their name "label" and use "Bagci" in their name as "alias". This is the practice I have always done in similar cases and never nobody complained of. Thanks. --E4024 (talk) 13:04, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
    • @E4024: if you change the label, please make sure to include a reference with the spelling. --- Jura 13:12, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
      • @E4024: For Hakan Bagci and Ibrahim Ethem Bagci, I would prefer to have the diacritic-free version as the label in English and the version with diacritics as the alias in English (and only Bağcı in Turkish), because it would appear that these academics generally spell their surnames as Bagci in English and Bağcı in Turkish. Deryck Chan (talk) 13:44, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
      • @Jura1: Would you be amenable to a merge of the two items? Deryck Chan (talk) 13:44, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
        • I found a series of other people where only the ASCII spelling is attested, so: no, as it would be contrary to what is being done for name items in general. Even for people where we can find both spellings, both items can be helpful. --- Jura 13:49, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
  • → ← Should be merged Per E4024, same Turk calling with just a little differents in some rurals are not notable to have separate items. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:12, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

Q74528074[edit]

Eklavya Sakpal (Q74528074): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Does not meet the notability policy David (talk) 15:08, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

  • As long as none of his IMDb entries have Wikidata items, then I would support deletion. But if he can be added as a writer/director of anything in the system, then that may make a difference. Quakewoody (talk) 18:09, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

Q26224956[edit]

Batrachylinae (Q26224956): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Double with Q630054 --Rembert Andy (talk) 07:32, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep, family vs. subfamily. Even if the subfamily is monotypical within family as in this situation, it's good for structural need, ergo it's not duplicate and complies the notability policy. --Wolverène (talk) 12:43, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • @Wolverène: The subfamily is the family. It is reclassified into a family. See enwiki article. I think it could be made into a redirect. Are you saying the subfamily still exists after being made into a family and it could at one point get a second subfamily? If that is the case I guess it could have its own item. But I am not familiar enough with the system, so you would have to clarify for me. Sincerely, Taketa (talk) 04:27, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
    • I can't clarify anything, I'm not informed better than you. This monotypical subfamily has been distinguished in 1965 by José María Gallardo, he might have a reason. Unless it was a formal classification within source without a try to describe specific features of taxon. --Wolverène (talk) 05:38, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
    • Actually I admit that it can be merged. --Wolverène (talk) 05:43, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

Q71648308[edit]

Nari O Progati (Q71648308): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No sitelinks, links from other third party sources, or other indication of notability. ~Moheen (keep talking) 05:27, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 4 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 05:30, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Comment: the 4 items that link here are also nominated for deletion. And the person listed as "publisher" is actually just a board member. But, due to my poor translations, this assumes that they are even the same company. Quakewoody (talk) 11:47, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Q59691317[edit]

Ferdous Hossain (Q59691317): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No sitelinks, links from other third party sources, or other indication of notability. ~Moheen (keep talking) 05:29, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 05:30, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep fills a structural need as author of papers that have items Quakewoody (talk) 11:49, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Q19704343[edit]

Patent (Q19704343): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Conflicting with Q253623 Futhark1988 (talk) 07:36, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

@Futhark1988: - What do you meen with "conflicting"? Both items have and entry on the huwiki, should be fixed there first. - сyсn - (talkcontribslogs) 08:14, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
The existing link looks like it should be moved to invention (Q18119757). Peter James (talk) 18:31, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

Q14107066[edit]

Juan Antonio Holgado Sanchez (Q14107066): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Does not meet the notability policy David (talk) 16:11, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

This was created for a statement that was recently removed from Sanchón de la Ribera (Q1766089) - was it correctly removed or should it have had a qualifier such as point in time or end date added? Peter James (talk) 23:04, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

Q68164681[edit]

Q68164681: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Clochers.org item does not exist Peter17 (talk) 11:03, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

According to http://www.eglisesdeloise.com/monument/dives-eglise-saint-martin/ the church was destroyed in 1918; its replacement, Q41784977, was built in the 1920s. Peter James (talk) 11:35, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 14:52, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

Q3542023[edit]

Q3542023: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Squamous cell carcinoma already present under Q681817, "Tumeur malpighienne" in Q681817 added to alternative spellings. "Malpighisk svulst" according to Google translator malignant tumor (<> squamous cell carcinoma) --HartmutGöthel (talk) 19:27, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 19:30, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

Q17105018[edit]

dough scraper (Q17105018): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty item. --Hildeoc (talk) 19:23, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

  • @Hildeoc: As you may have noticed from the English article, a dough scraper is a special case of a scraper. Therefore, the items should not be unified. Also, you can merge items if you think two items should be unified, which is not the case in this situation. This is also explained on the linked help page. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 19:37, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

Q75674911[edit]

Saucony Originals (Q75674911): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable(no sitelinks or external IDs) 94rain (talk) 10:58, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Q29591412[edit]

Boomerang (Q29591412): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non-notable. P199 (talk) 18:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Q29610130[edit]

fairy (Q29610130): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non-notable, we already have fairy (Q8028). P199 (talk) 18:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Mythical being vs. fictional race from video games. Not the same. --Wolverène (talk) 18:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
But then the question becomes - do we need to have a "fictional race from video games", which are really not a fictional race as much as a "mythical being" that was imported into the video game as a race. Quakewoody (talk)
Note that within the fantasy game scripts they aren't mythical towards playable characters (unless they are playable itself). See also en:Universe of The Legend of Zelda#Fairy, I understand they are not that kind of fairies like Melusine or Cinderella's godmother. --Wolverène (talk) 18:59, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
I look at it as - Do we need Humans and Humans (race of characters in the Star Wars franchise). Quakewoody (talk)
I'm afraid I'm not ready to delve so deep into this... --Wolverène (talk) 20:32, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Well, IMO, this certainly doesn't deserve an item on Wikidata. May as well have an item for every pixel for every video game. This is not the scope of Wikidata... --P199 (talk) 18:02, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Let's delete all the items about video game characters then. --Wolverène (talk) 09:05, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
I can agree to that - within reason. Example; Pac Man spawned sequels, spin offs, merchandising, tv, and movies. Quakewoody (talk) 09:49, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Agree also to delete individual video game elements, not related but separate items as mentioned by User:Quakewoody. --P199 (talk) 14:43, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

Q11243234[edit]

SHINNOSK8 (Q11243234): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Deleted on jawiki. Not notable. 本日晴天 (talk) 11:11, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

  • Alone, as himself, not notable. But he appears to be a member of KAMINARI-KAZOKU., which would then mean he serves a structural need - if someone were to link them properly. **PLEASE NOTE** I say "appears to be" because I have translation/cultural issues and can't tell for sure. And that assumes that the group's wikipedia/wikidata entries do not also get deleted for being non-notable. Quakewoody (talk) 12:10, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
And just so there is no confusion - Symbol keep vote.svg Keep , but I reserve my right to change my vote depending on what others have to say about my comment above. I am mainly looking for people who speak the language to be able to understand articles without a translation device. Quakewoody (talk) 14:35, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

Q76023674[edit]

Pája Čubrovka (Q76023674): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Is this person notable? EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:26, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

@EugeneZelenko: Notability of YouTubers of TikTokers is very disputable thing. I have no an idea whether 13 thousands followers are few or many, in context of TikTok. However, when the WikiData item was created, the person had its Wikipedia article and its Commons category, i.e. there was a technical reason to connect them both through a WikiData item. Maybe, the Wikipedia article can be deleted, but there is no reason to delete the images and Commons category.
Btw, I have a sense that a "notability" for WikiData is evaluated a bit different than for Wikipedia projects, e.g. some colleagues imported here whole registers of streets and squares, even though most of them will have never its own article at any Wikipedia. --ŠJů (talk) 21:06, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Looks like article on Wikipedia has multiple issues, including notability (Předmět tohoto článku možná nesplňuje podmínky významnosti.). --EugeneZelenko (talk) 00:08, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
No one is denying that the WP article is going to be deleted. But WD can't do anything about the WP article, and WD can't do anything until WP does. Quakewoody (talk)
  • Update: the WP articles have been deleted. But the stuff on commons is still pending. Quakewoody (talk) 11:54, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Q75915893[edit]

Aimeri II de Narbonne, Vicomte de Narbonne (Q75915893): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Unexistant person, mistake of http://www.thepeerage.com/ (automatic creation) BeatrixBelibaste (talk) 16:41, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

  • I've restored the information you removed from the item. Where do you see that the entry is a mistake? Quakewoody (talk)
This entry on The Peerage confuses two people, Aimery III of Narbonne (son of Pedro Manrique de Lara and Sancha of Navarre) and his son Amalric I of Narbonne (husband of Philippa of Anduze). BeatrixBelibaste (talk) 18:02, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
So you are saying they are the same person and the items should be merged? Quakewoody (talk)
No! Q547318 and Q14643182 are two different, well documented persons. The issue is Q75915893, automatically created from The Peerage, with mixed elements of Q547318 and Q14643182. Should we add The Peerage ID to both elements and merge Q75915893 with Q14643182 instead ?BeatrixBelibaste (talk) 18:47, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for clarifying. Now we are going to need more opinions on this type of situation. Quakewoody (talk)
Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 23:00, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Since the item has been updated with P31, can we close this nomination? Quakewoody (talk) 11:55, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Q76446281[edit]

Jeannette Sherwin (Q76446281): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Does not meet the notability policy David (talk) 15:52, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

  • I think her name should be spelled Jeannette. Then you'll get hits for her name. But I have as of yet decided on a vote. Quakewoody (talk)
Symbol keep vote.svg Keep In addition to the identifiers I found, I didn't realize her mother has a WP article. Quakewoody (talk) 17:49, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
and just to avoid any issues in the future if someone should ask - I created an item for her brother, because one of his wives has a WP article. But I did not create any addition family items. Quakewoody (talk)
Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:09, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Now that the item has been updated and structural links provided, can we close this nomination? Quakewoody (talk) 11:57, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Q30030713[edit]

Siligo (Q30030713): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Null page with no connection Euro know (talk) 19:37, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

Symbol keep vote.svg Keep real town, no reason to delete. VIGNERON (talk) 20:53, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Many items for civil parishes in England are combined with the village or town of the same name - it looks like this is the only town or village in Siligo (Q36198) so should they be merged? There are also deletion requests for Q30028540, which is similar, and Q30026267, which may be better kept separate as it contains places other than the one it is named after. Peter James (talk) 21:05, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
@Peter James: indeed, many item combine different things but I don't think this is not a good idea ; from experience, it only causes problem afterwards. « it looks like this is the only town or village in Siligo (Q36198) » is it really? And what about other things located in the commune (Siligo (Q36198)) but not in the town (Siligo (Q30030713)) like Q29587337, Q30537422 or Q47485758. Of course you may disagree but - at least for now - I stand by my point of view. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 11:09, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
Symbol keep vote.svg Keep per VIGNERON. --Pasleim (talk) 17:55, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Q76609715[edit]

Dominic Selorm Yao Amuzu (Q76609715): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable P134toP4913 (talk) 10:54, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

  • I'd like to see someone fill in the data before we decide. A quick web search makes it seem like he may have some scholarly articles. This isn't my area of knowledge. Quakewoody (talk) 14:58, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 12:00, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

Q76631638[edit]

Q76631638: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable P134toP4913 (talk) 14:57, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

It has a GeoNames identifier, which says it's a populated place in Sudan. The map shows a populated place, and two identifiers with slightly different names - Najaru (7026103), which is currently in the item, and Nagaro (12104575). Peter James (talk) 11:35, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

Q76631232[edit]

Chbeir (Q76631232): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable P134toP4913 (talk) 14:57, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 15:01, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Comment: there are two people currently on WD with such a name, and a 3rd named Shabir who translates this way into French. I don't know what the WD rules are for "family name", but there are people using it. Quakewoody (talk) 12:01, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Q76488812[edit]

The Matchmaker's Playbook (Q76488812): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

English page was moved to draft. MovieFex (talk) 11:15, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

  • added some content from it to the item. --- Jura 12:07, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

Q1164462[edit]

chariot racing (Q1164462): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Q75266233 and Q1164462 are the same, need to be merged. --WikiHannibal (talk) 16:51, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 17:00, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Tethrippon is a variant of chariot racing. It was often during ancient times, but it's not obligatory to ride the chariot with exactly four horses while racings. --Wolverène (talk) 04:37, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

Q1144545[edit]

political history of Turkey (Q1144545): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

The Dutch article (Politieke geschiedenis van Turkije - Political history of Turkey) should be in Q3179879 and the Korean article (터키의 정치 - Politics of Turkey) should be in Q836655. I don't know how to do it, I'm not familiar with the Wikidata process. --Randam (talk) 03:06, 30 November 2019 (UTC)

Q76828023[edit]

Marcela Hinostroza (Q76828023): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Does not meet the notability policy David (talk) 15:04, 30 November 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 05:20, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Due to language issues, as she is mentioned on multiple WP articles in multiple languages, I added only basic data to show a structural need. But I will let native language speakers add more information and decide if it meets notability beyond her WP mentions and what I added. Quakewoody (talk) 05:59, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

Q75381653[edit]

stillborn son3 Oldenburg (Q75381653): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Lacks notability --- Jura 04:53, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 05:01, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

Q75437282[edit]

Sigrid of Halland (Q75437282): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This is an unsourced "person", and by all probability non-existing as well as unencyclopedic viking-age person. The only 'source' given for this entry seem to be a random e-mail between Shaun Hobson and Darryl Lundy from the 5th of February (which year ?). I don't think we can rely on such a random conversation by e-mail as source for something as important as family relations in the viking age, when no (as in NO) actual real sources mentions a 'Sigrid of Halland' in this way. --Oleryhlolsson (talk) 16:42, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

  • @Oleryhlolsson: how about adding a statements/references that it's likely legendary ? I think it's an advantage of having it to avoid that other users who come across it need to research it again. --- Jura 05:36, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
    • Perhaps your right, but then I would probably prefer to call it fictious or invented since I can't see, that she fits any legends that we know of. Oleryhlolsson (talk) 20:16, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

Q55308965[edit]

Category:Avebury prehistoric sites (Q55308965): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This was created for the Commons category link, which I moved to Avebury and Associated Monuments (Q64817813). Peter James (talk) 22:05, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 22:11, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Deletion is fine by me, now that there's a primary item for this grouping. Jheald (talk) 22:21, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

GZWDer's Peerage Import[edit]

GZWDer (talkcontribslogs) seems to have decided to import ~300,000 items from ThePeerage without seeking community approval via a bot approval (or for using the flooding account for it). I think we voiced the desire to have big imports have community approval very clearly in the recent discussions around the import of scientific papers in which GZWDer also took part, so he should be aware of the desire of the community to have such imports go through a bot approval process. Given that there are multiple modeling issues and deletion requests for individual items already, I think we should discuss here whether or not we should delete the whole import. ChristianKl❫ 09:44, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

  • I'd favor deleting items about living minors imported part of this batch (i.e. items about person born after 1999 that didn't have an item before the import) as well as some entries about "unknown" people (see items mentioned on project chat). Also note Wikidata:Requests_for_deletions#Q75381653 above.
Overall, I think the quality of the import is rather good. As with imports of such scale, some duplicates can't be avoided. Given the structure of the entries, the import had to be done in two steps: first create entries, then add family relationships. Some other user who did a smaller import just added the family relationships in the description and then left it for users to clean up. Oddly, nothing is really being done about it .. --- Jura 09:57, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
  • I think there are cleanup issues - notably around merging - but the majority of these are okay and should be kept. I would strongly oppose a blanket deletion. They're pretty useful to help build the web of relationships between people, and if we deleted them we might just end up having to reimport later.
Having said that, I think we could reasonably think about deleting the "unknown" items - if all we know is that someone was the unknown child of someone else, or the unknown parent of someone else, that's of no real value to us or to anyone else. "Unknown" people are useful, though, if they make a link we didn't otherwise know about - eg Person A had an unknown brother, who married Person B; or Person C had an unknown daughter, who married Person D. Is there a way we can practically set up a query to look for unknown items that have structural vs non-structural importance? Andrew Gray (talk) 10:42, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
On another site (which only allows parent/child, sibling, and spouse relationships) we allow the unknown name and/or non-notable party if it is needed to connect to others. Since that site only allows "one step" relationships, it is impossible to connect grandchildren or uncles. Sometimes it is even needed to connect the in-law family - i.e., to connect notable Person A with notable Person B, we create the "name unknown" Person C who is the sibling of A and is the spouse of B. Quakewoody (talk)

Q77037356[edit]

Santalahti Paper Mill (Q77037356): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable P134toP4913 (talk) 10:29, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 10:30, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Because of translation issues, I can't do it. But I would like to see someone cleanup and verify the connections. It looks like to me that AJ Renquist owns AJ Renquist? Quakewoody (talk) 12:57, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
@Quakewoody: I'll be happy to any cleanup, if you identify the issues. All the connections are referenced, are they not? Finnusertop at work (talk) 13:04, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
For starters, there are the little icons next to some of the data displaying where some of the problems are. Quakewoody (talk)
@Quakewoody: Fixed. Finnusertop at work (talk) 10:22, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Ok, I am going to give this one a Symbol keep vote.svg Keep because of the structural needs. Even my previous comment AJ Renquist owns AJ Renquist has been cleared up. Quakewoody (talk) 19:35, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

Q77211536[edit]

plausibility (Q77211536): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not Notable P134toP4913 (talk) 11:32, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

  • May this be a redirect to Q1530061? How synonymous plausibility and credibility are? --Wolverène (talk) 11:54, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment In my opinion they are not synonyms, but I'm not native English speaker. Taivo (talk) 17:12, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Q33517480[edit]

Windischeschenbach (Q33517480): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

CEB spam Bahnmoeller (talk) 20:28, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:31, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Q77278090[edit]

Fuelman (Q77278090): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Spam/Not Notable P134toP4913 (talk) 04:12, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 04:31, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
  • I am going to say we keep it because it is has a notable parent company. But I will let others decide in case there are WD rules about subsidiaries. Quakewoody (talk)

Q77284078[edit]

Alexandra Bokova (Q77284078): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not Notable P134toP4913 (talk) 07:08, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

  • Just to note that she played the leading role in the horror film Mermaid Down, we don't have the item on it but the film looks like notable for Wikidata. The Google requests shows several links about her and especially about that role as mermaid. --Wolverène (talk) 08:43, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Added a bit more information. --Wolverène (talk) 08:57, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Right now, she doesn't pass. If someone created a WP article for that movie... but, even the production crews and cast members of that movie are lacking representation on WD. Same for the other credits she has on IMDb, very little notability found connected with any of it. Quakewoody (talk)
    • I've added reference URL's, so the item is already notable. I can also create a couple of Wikipedia pages but they will not be of course in en- or ruwp. Creating a page about the film is somewhat harder. --Wolverène (talk) 15:43, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
I created two WD items/movie titles and linked the various cast members. I'm still not sold on notability for any of it, but at least the connections have been built. Quakewoody (talk) 17:32, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Thank you. On Friday I'll pay more attention on these three. --Wolverène (talk) 18:03, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Sorry I couldn't do this within the term as I had troubles with my PC. I didn't forget. --Wolverène (talk) 18:46, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 16:11, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

Q77285095[edit]

Arctic Data Center (Q77285095): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not Notable P134toP4913 (talk) 07:09, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 10:50, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
  • I am giving this a weak keep based on the fact that it has a notable founder. Quakewoody (talk)

Q20433613[edit]

Q20433613: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There's already Q25301 StanProg (talk) 14:52, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 15:01, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

Q65247514[edit]

Ria (Q65247514): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This item needs to be removed because there is a mixup between fjords and rias in the Japanese articles --Mccunicano (talk) 02:05, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 02:11, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Given that the article has a sitelink it's notable and won't be deleted in that state. Maybe you mean that this item should be merged with another? ChristianKl❫ 20:02, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Q25649159[edit]

Little pied cormorant (Q25649159): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Duplicate of Q783177 and with less info. Should be merged to Q783177. As a newbie I was overwhelmed by merging so I couldn't do it myself yet. I am not an expert on this subject so this probably should be confirmed by someone.

Other similar cases: Q28106685 (Q703790 is the better article), Q27452709 (Q47109 is better), Q20782128 (Q45696 is better).

I found these because the description couldn't be edited (duplicate label/description combination). All of them seem to be synonyms of the same species. --Epätiedoton (talk) 15:16, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 15:21, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

Q15630491[edit]

Jacobaea vulgaris (Q15630491): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Needs to be merged with Q1144724. Q15630491 contains the newer synonym. --Rembert Andy (talk) 17:09, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 17:11, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

Q77350030[edit]

Swarup Solanki (Q77350030): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Gibberish by an xwiki vanity spammer Praxidicae (talk) 20:04, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold. It contains sitelinks, but has been marked for speedy deletion. Once they're deleted, it can be deleted here too. Esteban16 (talk) 00:46, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Q77459175 merged into older-created Q77350030 so I guess it's now better to discuss exactly Q77350030. --Wolverène (talk) 08:02, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Q62102265[edit]

Aline Dajoz (Q62102265): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Doesn't seem to pass WD:N --Nomen ad hoc (talk) 21:42, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 7 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:50, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep All the people with own WD items related to her have Wikipedia pages. I'm afraid/supposing that this item may be re-created later anyway, justifying it by a sctructural need (WD:N #3) and in order to complete the "family tree". --Wolverène (talk) 07:55, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep as noted above.

Q72860936[edit]

Dhrumil Soni (Q72860936): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not Notable --49.34.187.94 06:45, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

  • He's had local articles written about him (most read like press releases). But I don't know how that fits into WD notability. They are all very short articles containing mostly the same information as each other, and they were written within a few months of each other. Quakewoody (talk) 12:27, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Q6408835[edit]

Kim Iversen (Q6408835): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs | discussion)

Does not meet the notability policy David (talk) 14:30, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

  • She has lots of web hits. But I don't know if that equals notability. Quakewoody (talk) 14:48, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Q66907689[edit]

Aybars İbak (Q66907689): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Previously nominated. Prematurely closed. Awaiting one more article deletion. --Quakewoody (talk) 19:20, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

  • Originally nominated with Cross-wiki spam for a subject with no relevance whatsoever, speedy deletion has been requested on all projects affected. Archived here.
  • I really wish people would be more careful when they close a nomination. There's been more than 2 dozen articles deleted, with one still remaining. There was absolutely no reason to close the WD nomination. Quakewoody (talk) 19:20, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Q77700321[edit]

Q77700321: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

I've recognized too late that a correspondig object exists --Warrel040 (talk) 16:21, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

  • what is the other item, so that we can merge them Quakewoody (talk) 12:29, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Q36152680[edit]

Český Krumlov Encyclopedia identifier (Q36152680): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not an identifier Adam Harangozó (talk) 21:29, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

Q64760245[edit]

Bowsette (Q64760245): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not a real name -- there's no reason to believe that anyone besides Bowsette (Q56798453) has ever been named "Bowsette" --IagoQnsi (talk) 21:54, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 22:00, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
  • I went to 411 and White Pages and found no one with this name. Quakewoody (talk) 12:32, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Q77611929[edit]

Curavita (Q77611929): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Spam Jklamo (talk) 09:27, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Q77538436[edit]

Cascade Healthcare Solutions (Q77538436): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Spam Jklamo (talk) 09:28, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Q77470689[edit]

Baltimore Tow Truck (Q77470689): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Spam Jklamo (talk) 09:29, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Q66908994[edit]

Mohammad Tiregar (Q66908994): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Pure vandalism and blatant hoaxes فرهنگ2016 (talk) 11:04, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 11:10, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
And if anyone knows how to speak the languages, please review Q67334704 and its WP articles. Quakewoody (talk) 13:24, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Q77816993[edit]

Zccvx (Q77816993): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty item — Mike Novikoff 12:17, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Q69524646[edit]

Caryn Marjorie (Q69524646): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability Quakewoody (talk) 13:30, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Q71228457[edit]

Ulyses Osuna (Q71228457): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability Quakewoody (talk) 13:31, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Q72868448[edit]

Ishan Goel (Q72868448): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability Quakewoody (talk) 13:32, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Q73077401[edit]

Iman Gadzhi (Q73077401): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability Quakewoody (talk) 13:33, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Q73440893[edit]

Sebastian Dobrincu (Q73440893): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability Quakewoody (talk) 13:34, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Q73671586[edit]

Shane Gregoire (Entrepreneur) (Q73671586): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability Quakewoody (talk) 13:35, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Q73923161[edit]

Victor Garibay (Entrepreneur) (Q73923161): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability Quakewoody (talk) 13:36, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Q74473418[edit]

Alex MacLean (Entrepreneur) (Q74473418): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability Quakewoody (talk) 13:37, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 13:40, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
  • one of the 2 items is a "different from", and the other is also nominated. Quakewoody (talk) 14:35, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Q74471460[edit]

Scott Hilse (Q74471460): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability Quakewoody (talk) 13:37, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Q74098230[edit]

Justin Woll (Q74098230): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability Quakewoody (talk) 13:37, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Q76203362[edit]

Sam Bakhtiar (Q76203362): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability Quakewoody (talk) 13:38, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Q76018987[edit]

ChapoBanz (Q76018987): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability Quakewoody (talk) 13:40, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Q77710498[edit]

nancy aiello tours (Q77710498): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs | discussion)

Empty item David (talk) 13:42, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Q75212728[edit]

Parker Pannell (Q75212728): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability Quakewoody (talk) 13:48, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Q74495807[edit]

East Coast Lifestyle (Q74495807): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability Quakewoody (talk) 13:49, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 13:50, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Q74476138[edit]

Lucy Guo (Q74476138): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability Quakewoody (talk) 13:49, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Q77261615[edit]

Tristan Hamm (Q77261615): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability Quakewoody (talk) 14:28, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Q77257897[edit]

Devain Doolaramani (Q77257897): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability Quakewoody (talk) 14:29, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Q77170386[edit]

David Johnson Wood (Entrepreneur) (Q77170386): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability Quakewoody (talk) 14:29, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Q76925628[edit]

Andrea Giunti Lombardo (Q76925628): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability Quakewoody (talk) 14:30, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Q76918917[edit]

Sean Kelly (American entrepreneur) (Q76918917): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability Quakewoody (talk) 14:30, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Q67158495[edit]

Arshdeep Bhardwaj (Q67158495): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability Quakewoody (talk) 14:37, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Q65053355[edit]

Michael Gruen (Q65053355): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability Quakewoody (talk) 14:39, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 14:40, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Q66084982[edit]

Decentral Bank (Q66084982): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability Quakewoody (talk) 14:39, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 14:40, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Q11817055[edit]

Tor Pilica (Q11817055): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Q56340818 --WrS.tm.pl (talk) 18:55, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

  • There are two pl.WP entries for this merge. A native speaker will need to translate to determine what needs done. Quakewoody (talk) 20:30, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Q18431720[edit]

Q18431720: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Blank entry, cannot link pl Wiki in Q955199 --178.19.179.235 19:06, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Q77865224[edit]

Category:Category:1491 in art‎ (Q77865224): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Failure Crazy1880 (talk) 20:23, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Q77866811[edit]

Q77866811: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Duplicate of Q3567997 Roptat (talk) 20:47, 8 December 2019 (UTC)